SPARTAN 2822 — Internal Team Resource Public reference site →
🧰 INTAKE / MANIPULATOR · PROPOSAL

Polycarb Tube Intake — Theoretical Analysis

A heat-bent polycarbonate tube acts as the intake shell. A 5.5W motor rotates it for fine orientation. A pneumatic cylinder pulls a string inside the tube to cinch around a held element. Inspired by Team 355Z's design from the recent Luke-Does-Robotics speedcad. This page documents the R24-legal fabrication process, orientation/cinch hardware layout, and the theoretical decision analysis for pairing this intake with the chain bar vs. swing bar lifts.

📋 Status
Coach-T proposal, drafted 05/09/2026 for partner team considering polycarb tube intake. Reads alongside /spartan-hero-chainbar-lift and /spartan-hero-swingbar-lift. Bottom-line conclusion in Section 5 of this page: chain bar + tube wins on cup reliability and control simplicity; swing bar + tube wins on mechanical simplicity and notebook-story flexibility.
SECTION 0 / 5

What This Intake Is

A 4 in long, 2.55 in inner-diameter polycarbonate cylinder, heat-bent from a single 4×8 in sheet. Mechanically fastened to two end caps that ride a hex shaft through their bearing centers. Drive: one 5.5W motor through a 1:5 reduction. Grip: a 1mm Spectra cord routed through two 1/16 in holes in the tube wall, cinched by a pneumatic cylinder via a hollow shaft.

Yes — Bending Polycarb Is Legal

Per R24d, verbatim: "Plastic may be mechanically altered by cutting, drilling, bending, etc. It cannot be chemically treated, melted, cast, or bonded to another part. Heating non-shattering plastic to aid in bending is acceptable." Polycarbonate (Lexan) is on the legal-types list per R24e. The two binding constraints:

The line that gets teams DQed: melting vs. heating. The forming temperature window is 280–310 °F (above polycarb's ~295 °F glass transition, well below ~370 °F where it melts and degrades). Use a non-contact IR thermometer at the heat gun's nozzle. Document the temperature in the build log. Inspectors who see a clean, clear, undistorted bend will not question it; one that's discolored or has visible flow lines will.
Side view — assembly with rotation drive, cinch string, and held pin
TOP-DOWN VIEW · SWING ARM POINTING RIGHT TOWARD GOAL swing bar arm (extruded aluminum) — or chain bar end-platform 5.5W motor 276-4842 12T 60T (1:5 reduction) hex shaft (rotates with tube) ~10° seam (no bond) pin (1.6 in dia) · inside tube Spectra (1mm) through hollow axle pneumatic cyl. 1 in stroke end cap end cap Polycarbonate tube spec · R24 compliant Material: polycarbonate Sheet: 4 × 8 × 0.060 in Bent to: 2.55 in ID × 4 in Seam: ~10° open gap Counts as: 1 of 12 R24 pieces Heating: legal (R24d) String mechanism Path: anchor → 2 holes Hole spacing: 180° apart Hole position: tube midpoint Hole size: 1/16 in (1.6mm) Cinch: pulls chord taut Friction grip on pin Power budget Drive: 4 × 11W = 44W Lift (chain or swing): 11W Toggle: 11W Tube rotation: 5.5W Total: 71.5W (cap 88W) Headroom: 16.5W spare
Same intake mechanism works on either lift — the difference is whether the lift's manipulator stays level (chain bar) or rotates 180° with the arm (swing bar). Section 4 covers both pairings.

Three Functions, Three Subsystems

SECTION 1 / 5

Phase 1 — Bending the Tube

Five steps from a flat polycarbonate sheet to a finished tube. R24-compliant throughout.

What You'll Need

Step 1 — Cut the Flat Pattern

Score-and-snap or band-saw a 4 × 8 in rectangle. Verify dimensions with calipers — inspectors will measure. Sand all four edges with 220-grit until smooth. Sharp edges are stress concentrators that crack during bending.

📷
Photograph the flat sheet with a ruler in frame before doing anything else. Insert into the build-log notebook entry. This pre-empts every R24 question an inspector might ask about the original sheet size.

Step 2 — Drill the String Holes BEFORE Bending

Drilling a flat sheet on a drill press is straightforward. Drilling a curved tube is a recipe for cracks. Mark two 1/16 in holes, both on the long axis at the 4 in midpoint, spaced exactly 4 in apart along the 8 in length — they will end up 180° apart on the finished tube. Center-punch lightly, drill with a sharp bit at low RPM, deburr both sides.

Hole geometry:
  flat sheet 4 × 8 in → tube ID 2.55 in × length 4 in
  circumference of tube = 8 in (the long dimension wraps)
  holes at positions (4 in axial, 0 in around) and (4 in axial, 4 in around)
  → on finished tube: 180° apart at the axial midpoint

Step 3 — Heat Evenly

Polycarbonate's glass transition is around 295 °F. Aim for 280–310 °F on the surface. Sweep the heat gun across the entire sheet for 60–90 seconds until it's pliable like leather — flexes 30° under light hand pressure with no cracking sound.

Above 320 °F polycarb starts to discolor (yellowing, then brown). Above 370 °F it flows like a liquid — that's "melting," explicitly banned by R24d. If you see any discoloration, stop and start over with a new piece. Don't focus heat in one spot — uneven heating causes uneven bend radius and stress fractures.

Step 4 — Wrap and Clamp

Lay the heated sheet flat, place the 2.4 in mandrel along one short edge, and roll the sheet around the mandrel. Aim for ~10° gap at the seam — do not try to close it. The gap is where the spring-back margin lives, and a closed seam invites a future student to bond it (illegal). Wrap clean cotton cloth tightly around the assembly. Apply two C-clamps with rubber pads at the ends. Wait 5 minutes for the polycarbonate to cool below glass transition.

Step 5 — Release and Check

Remove clamps and slide the mandrel out. The tube will spring open by 5–10° — that's the gap design. Final ID should be 2.4–2.55 in. If tighter, you over-bent (re-heat lightly, relax); if looser, you under-bent (re-heat, clamp again). Photograph the finished tube with the mandrel partially inserted (visual proof of single-piece formation, no bonding).

Notebook Documentation Required for Inspection

  1. Photo of original 4×8 sheet with ruler, before any cuts. Build-log slide.
  2. Process notes: cut at 4×8 (verify), drilled at 4 in centers, heat-formed at actual measured temperature over 2.4 in mandrel, no adhesive used, mechanical fastening only via #4-40 screws.
  3. R24 piece-count entry: "Tube: 1 piece. Total robot non-shattering plastic count: X of 12 max."
  4. Photo of finished tube with caliper showing ID. Confirms dimensional spec.
SECTION 2 / 5

Phase 2 — Orientation Mech

The tube spins on a hex shaft driven by a 5.5W motor through a 1:5 sprocket reduction. Mechanical-fastening only — no adhesive at any joint.

End Caps

Cut two 1×1×3 VEX C-channel pieces. Drill the center hole sized for the shaft (1/4 in or 5mm hex — match what's already on the lift). Press a bearing flat into each end cap on the inside face. The bearing bore positions the tube precisely centered on the shaft. End caps DO NOT touch the polycarbonate directly — bolt them through the tube wall using #4-40 screws + washers on both sides. Washers spread the clamping load so the screw head doesn't crack the polycarb.

End-cap mounting holes:
  4 holes through tube near each end (8 holes total)
  90° apart around the tube
  0.25 in from tube edge
  #4-40 × 1/2 in screws + washers + nylock nuts
  NO ADHESIVE — mechanical clamping only

Sprocket Placement

Mount a 60T high-strength sprocket on the hex shaft, just outboard of one end cap. Mount a 12T sprocket on the 5.5W motor's output shaft. Connect with #25 chain. Keep the chain run short (~3 in center-to-center) for tight tracking and minimal slap. Use a chain tensioner if needed — small idler sprocket on a slotted bracket.

Why 1:5

Stock 5.5W cartridge gives 100 RPM. After 1:5 reduction → 20 RPM at the tube — about 3 seconds per quarter-turn. Fast enough for orientation changes between scoring sequences, slow enough that a held element doesn't fly out under angular momentum if the cinch hasn't pulled tight yet.

💡
Fallback to 1:3 if testing shows you need faster orientation changes — that's 33 RPM at the tube, ~1.8 seconds per quarter-turn. Don't go below 1:3 (closer to direct drive) — torque margin matters more than speed for this mechanism, especially when starting from rest.

Sensor Choice

Two options:

  1. Pot V2 on the 60T sprocket axle (recommended): absolute angle feedback that survives power cycles. Wire to ADI port. Read angle in degrees, drive PID to setpoint.
  2. Motor-internal encoder + limit switch: cheaper but requires zeroing every match by driving to the limit switch. Acceptable as a fallback.

Mounting to the Lift

The whole assembly — tube, end caps, axle, sprockets, motor — bolts to the end of the lift arm via a small mounting plate. The assembly's footprint (about 6 in wide × 3 in tall × 5 in deep) is well within the 18-in-wide chassis envelope at horizontal rest. Verify R3 fit before tightening the final bolts — the mounted intake must clear the chassis cavity at θ = 0° and θ = 180° (or the chain-bar level position).

SECTION 3 / 5

Phase 3 — String + Piston Layout

The pneumatic cylinder pulls a string that cinches around the held element. Three cylinder-mounting options — pick A unless you have a strong reason for B or C.

The Three Mounting Options

OptionCylinder locationAir line routingVerdict
A — StationaryMounted on the lift arm, opposite end from the motor. Aligned with shaft axis.Air line runs along the lift arm to the cylinder. Stationary on the arm, flexes only with arm motion.Recommended. Cleanest air-line routing. Swivel ferrule between rod and string decouples twist.
B — RotatingBolted to the rotating tube assembly between the end caps.Air line rotates with the tube. Needs spool or rotary union.Don't. Rotary unions aren't stock VEX parts. Fail mode is air leak under rotation.
C — CoaxialInside the tube, rod becomes the string anchor.Air line runs through the hollow axle.Compact but constrained. Cylinder body must fit inside 2.55 in ID. Only smallest VEX cylinders work.

Option A — Recommended Layout

The cylinder body bolts to the lift arm at the opposite end from the motor, with its rod pointed in line with the rotating axle. The string runs from the rod, into the end of the hex shaft (drilled out to a 1/8 in through-bore for hollow operation), through the tube interior, anchors at the far end cap.

String Routing — Step by Step

  1. Anchor: drill-and-screw a 1/4 in standoff to the inside face of the left-side (motor-side) end cap. Tie a bowline knot in the string and loop it around the standoff.
  2. First pass: from the standoff, run the string radially through the right-side hole (out from inside of the tube to the outside).
  3. Crossing: from the right-side hole, route the string back across the tube interior to the left-side hole.
  4. Exit: string exits the tube through the left-side hole, then runs along the inside of the tube to the end-cap-side end cap, through the hollow hex shaft, out the right-side end cap to the cylinder rod.
  5. Termination: swivel ferrule (decouples string twist from cylinder linear motion), then short pigtail to the cylinder rod-end.
📊
Cinch force math: VEX 1 in cylinder at 100 psi = 78 lbf push force. Friction in routing (axle bend, hole edges) wastes ~30%. Net cinch force = ~50 lbf. Pin mass = 0.16 lb; max acceleration on a chain bar tip at peak = ~30 ft/s² = ~1g. Required hold force = 0.16 lbf. 50 lbf available, 0.16 lbf required — 300:1 safety factor. Cinch doesn't slip.

Why a Hollow Hex Shaft

VEX doesn't sell a hollow hex shaft as a stock part, but you can drill out a 1/4 in solid hex shaft on a lathe to a 1/8 in through-bore. Document the modification in the build log — it's a "fabricated part" derived from a legal raw stock part.

Drill-out integrity check: a 1/4 in shaft drilled to 1/8 in has only 1/16 in wall thickness on each side. Verify with a torque test before relying on it — clamp one end in a vise and apply 0.5 N·m at the other end. Should not deform or twist visibly. If it does, switch to a 5/16 in shaft drilled to 1/8 in (more wall thickness).

Solenoid + Air System

SECTION 4 / 5

Lift Compatibility — Chain Bar vs. Swing Bar

The same intake mechanism works on either lift — but the lift's orientation behavior changes what the 5.5W rotation has to do, which cascades into control-software complexity, cup reliability, and how often things go wrong in driver practice.

The Key Geometric Difference

 Chain bar liftSwing bar lift
Manipulator orientation through arcStays level (1:1 chain on static sprocket)Rotates 180° with arm
Tube axial axis through arcStays horizontal (perpendicular to arc plane)Stays horizontal (perpendicular to arc plane)
Held element orientation through arcPreserved — cup stays upright, pin stays orientedInverted at 180° unless 5.5W counter-rotates
Role of the 5.5W rotation motorFine alignment only — rotates tube to match goal stem orientation at deposit. Set-and-hold, no continuous control.Compensation — must counter-rotate to keep cup upright through the arc, OR re-orient at deposit. Continuous coordination with lift angle.

Chain Bar Pairing — Why It's the Cleaner Match

The chain bar's whole engineering virtue is that the 1:1 chain ratio keeps the manipulator level regardless of arm angle. When you mount the polycarb tube at the chain bar's end-platform, that level-preservation cascades to the held element — a cup picked up upright at the loader stays upright through the entire 180° sweep, arrives at the goal in the orientation it started in.

The 5.5W rotation motor is then doing one job: rotating the tube around its axial axis (the axis that runs left-right through the tube end caps, perpendicular to the lift's arc plane) to fine-align the held element with the goal stem at deposit. That's a set-and-hold operation:

  1. At pickup, rotate to angle A (loader-aligned).
  2. During transit, hold angle A.
  3. At deposit, rotate to angle B (goal-aligned).
  4. Cinch releases, element drops onto goal.
Software complexity: two PID setpoints (angle A, angle B), one digital output (cylinder), one chain bar PID (lift angle). Total: 3 PID loops + 1 boolean. Driver-friendly because each cycle is the same sequence.

Swing Bar Pairing — Mitigation B from the Swing Bar Page

The swing bar's defining issue is that the manipulator rotates 180° with the arm. When you mount the polycarb tube at the swing bar's end, the tube and any held element rotate with the arm too. The 5.5W rotation motor can compensate — this is exactly Mitigation B (active wrist motor) from /spartan-hero-swingbar-lift Section 2. The 5.5W has to do continuous coordination:

  1. At pickup (arm at 0°), tube rotation = angle A.
  2. During transit (arm sweeping 0° → 180°), tube rotation = angle A − arm angle. As arm rotates +180°, tube rotates −180° to keep element at angle A in world frame.
  3. At deposit (arm at 180°), tube rotation = angle B (goal-aligned), so the final command is angle B = angle A − 180°.
  4. Cinch releases, element drops.
Software complexity: tube rotation must track arm angle in real-time. That's a coupled control problem — lift PID and tube PID can't be tuned independently. If the tube falls behind the arm during a fast lift, the cup tilts mid-arc and could slip out of the cinch (the cinch holds against translation, not rotation slip). Plus: the cinch grip on a cup must survive the 180° rotation through gravity changes — at θ = 90°, the cup hangs sideways with all its weight pulling perpendicular to the cinch.

The Cup-Reliability Stress Test

Take the same cup, the same tube, the same string tension. Run 100 cycles on each lift and count drops:

ConfigurationTheoretical drop rate (cup)Theoretical drop rate (pin)Notes
Chain bar + tube< 2%< 1%Cup orientation never changes. Cinch only fights translation (≤ 1g acceleration). Drops are from cinch force decay (string fatigue) or pneumatic leak.
Swing bar + tube + Mit. B5–15%< 1%Cup drops are from rotation lag (tube falls behind arm) or coordinated-control tuning errors. Pin drops are rare because pin orientation flip is harmless.
Swing bar + tube + passive wrist (Mit. A)< 3%N/A (pin doesn't need wrist)Pendulum settling at deposit is the failure mode. Add 0.5 s settle delay in code. Drop rate approaches chain bar's number but at the cost of the freed motor port (the 5.5W is now wasted — the passive wrist is gravity-driven).

These are theoretical estimates pending build-and-test data. The point isn't the absolute numbers — it's the relative ratio. Chain bar + tube has the lowest cup-drop rate because it removes a class of failure mode (orientation lag) that the swing bar variants must actively manage.

SECTION 5 / 5

Theoretical Decision Matrix

Score 1–5 (5 = best). Three configurations: V1.5 baseline four-bar with standard claw, chain bar + polycarb tube intake, swing bar + polycarb tube intake. All scores are theoretical — pending build-and-test validation.
DimensionV1.5 four-bar + V5 clawChain bar + polycarb tubeSwing bar + polycarb tube
Cup deposit reliability 4
level + simple grip
5
level through arc + cinch + fine-orient
3
depends on Mit. B coordination
Pin deposit reliability 4
standard
5
cinch + level
5
orientation flip OK for pins
Pin-in-cup combo 3
grip width-limited
5
cinch holds combo at cup waist
3
pin shifts during rotation
Cycle time 3
multi-stage lift+tilt
4
one arc + one rotation
4
one arc, simpler than chain bar
Build complexity (higher = simpler) 4
well-known parts
2
chain + tube + cinch + 5.5W = many systems
3
no chain — one fewer subsystem
Control complexity (higher = simpler) 4
single-axis PID
4
decoupled PIDs (lift, rotate)
2
coupled control (rotate tracks lift)
Failure modes (higher = fewer) 4
claw, lift motor
3
chain, polycarb, string, cyl, cinch
3
polycarb, string, cyl, cinch (no chain)
Match flexibility (multi-goal) 5
angle-tunable per goal
2
tower-cut commits
2
tower-cut commits
Notebook story 3
familiar, less novel
5
many decision matrices
5
orientation analysis is rich
Total (out of 45) 34 35 30

What the Numbers Say

🎯
Recommendation for partner team: if they're committing to a build-from-scratch this season AND they want to score cups reliably, chain bar + polycarb tube intake is the highest-theoretical-score pairing. If they're swing-bar-committed for other reasons, the polycarb tube + Mitigation B (5.5W active wrist via this intake) is a viable but more demanding configuration; budget for ~10 hours of extra control-tuning time vs. the chain bar variant.

Sensitivity Analysis — What Would Change the Conclusion?

Where This Goes in the Notebook

Cross-References